Alignment & Preference Learning · 2020
Learning to Summarize from Human Feedback
It trained a summarization model against a reward model learned from human comparisons of candidate summaries, showing that optimizing for human preferences with reinforcement learning produces better summaries than optimizing for likelihood or standard automatic metrics like ROUGE.
Editorial record
Plain-language summary
Instead of training the model to imitate reference summaries, the authors collected human judgments of which of two summaries was better, trained a reward model to predict those judgments, and then used reinforcement learning to make the summarizer score highly on that reward. The resulting summaries were preferred by people over both the reference summaries and models trained by supervised imitation. This work is the practical template for reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) that later underpinned instruction-following chat models.
Knowledge graph
Relationships
Antecedents
ExtendsEvidence: Direct
InstructGPT: Training LMs to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback
InstructGPT extends RLHF-for-text to instruction following
P-202
Descendants
Applies toEvidence: Direct
Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences
Preference-RL applied to language summarization
P-201
Source record
Provenance
- Record ID
- P-201
- Record created
- 2026-07-13
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-14
- Record version
- 2
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01325
- arXiv:2009.01325
Citation caveat: Citation metadata is approximate and marked unverified in the source dataset.