Alignment & Preference Learning · 2020

Learning to Summarize from Human Feedback

Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Daniel Ziegler, et al.

It trained a summarization model against a reward model learned from human comparisons of candidate summaries, showing that optimizing for human preferences with reinforcement learning produces better summaries than optimizing for likelihood or standard automatic metrics like ROUGE.

Editorial record

Plain-language summary

Instead of training the model to imitate reference summaries, the authors collected human judgments of which of two summaries was better, trained a reward model to predict those judgments, and then used reinforcement learning to make the summarizer score highly on that reward. The resulting summaries were preferred by people over both the reference summaries and models trained by supervised imitation. This work is the practical template for reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) that later underpinned instruction-following chat models.

Knowledge graph

Relationships

Antecedents

Descendants

Source record

Provenance

Record ID
P-201
Record created
2026-07-13
Last reviewed
2026-07-14
Record version
2

Citation caveat: Citation metadata is approximate and marked unverified in the source dataset.